Massey Ferguson 246 DYNATRACK 2WD vs New Holland EXCEL 4710 4WD STS — Which is Better? 2026

Side-by-side comparison of the Massey Ferguson 246 DYNATRACK 2WD (Price on request) and New Holland EXCEL 4710 4WD STS (Price on request): HP, engine, hydraulics, price and Aglist Score.

Massey Ferguson 246 DYNATRACK 2WD New Holland EXCEL 4710 4WD STS
Aglist Score7.57.8
Engine HP4647
Engine capacity2,700—
Cylinders3—
Gearbox12 Forward + 12 Reverse8 Forward + 8 Reverse package; confirm option
Transmission typeFully constant meshConstant Mesh AFD, side shift; STS brochure
BrakesMulti-disc oil-immersed brakesOil-immersed multi-disc brakes
SteeringManual / power steering; confirm supplied optionPower steering
Lifting capacity—1,800 kg
Fuel tank55 litres60 litres
Weight2,010 kg2,155 kg
Wheelbase—2,040 mm
Drive2WD4WD
Front tyre6.00 x 169.50-20 high lug
Rear tyre14.9 x 2814.9-28 high lug

Aglist Score — broken down

Massey Ferguson 246 DYNATRACK 2WDNew Holland EXCEL 4710 4WD STS
Power & performance4.6—
Hydraulics & implements—7.8
Build & durability108.6
Comfort & usability8.18.1
Warranty & service reach8.57

Our verdict

Verdict by the Aglist editorial desk

On our score the New Holland EXCEL 4710 4WD STS (7.8/10) edges out the Massey Ferguson 246 DYNATRACK 2WD (7.5/10).

Massey Ferguson 246 DYNATRACK 2WD: Mixed field-and-transport buyers who will document axle configuration and test repeated direction changes.

New Holland EXCEL 4710 4WD STS: Buyers evaluating the STS high-lug 4WD configuration for a specific cultivation or paddy implement.

Other comparisons